Specific categories of cases

Complaint against the actions of the State Enforcement Service

A complaint against the actions of the State Enforcement Service is a legal instrument for protecting the rights and legitimate interests of an individual in cases of unlawful actions, inaction, or procedural violations by a state enforcement officer.

We provide full legal support at all stages:

  • Preparation of legal documents

    The lawyer analyzes the enforcement proceedings materials, assesses the lawfulness of the actions or inaction of the state enforcement officer, and prepares a well-substantiated complaint in accordance with legal requirements.

  • Legal analysis of violations

    A detailed legal analysis is conducted of the violations committed, including unlawful seizure of property or bank accounts, unjustified recovery of funds, delays in enforcement of a court decision, or abuse of authority.

  • Support in filing a complaint

    The lawyer ensures the proper and timely submission of the complaint to the relevant authority or court, monitors its consideration, and oversees compliance with established deadlines.

  • Protection of interests after review

    After the complaint is reviewed, the lawyer advises on further actions, monitors enforcement of the decision on the complaint, and, where necessary, provides further legal protection of the client’s interests.

A complaint against the actions of the State Enforcement Service in Kharkiv is a legally significant process aimed at protecting an individual’s rights in cases of unlawful actions or inaction by a state enforcement officer. Violations during enforcement proceedings — such as unjustified seizure of property or bank accounts, unlawful recovery of funds, delays in enforcing court decisions, or abuse of authority — may lead to serious legal and financial consequences. Therefore, timely legal assistance is essential for the effective protection of your interests.

By engaging our law firm in Kharkiv, you receive comprehensive legal support in challenging the actions of the State Enforcement Service. We thoroughly analyze enforcement case materials, prepare a legally substantiated complaint, ensure its proper submission, and monitor compliance with procedural deadlines.

We have extensive experience in handling cases related to the actions of the State Enforcement Service in Kharkiv and understand how crucial it is for clients to promptly restore their violated rights and stop unlawful actions. Each case is handled individually, taking into account the specific circumstances and the client’s objectives. Our goal is to ensure legal certainty, protect your property interests, and provide confidence in the outcome.

Do you need professional legal assistance with preparing and filing a complaint against the actions of the State Enforcement Service in Kharkiv?

Submit a request — we’ll contact you and help.

Get legal advice

Our cases

Adoption case

Enquiry:

His wife’s two sons were very attached to the client; they treated him like a father, and he treated them as if they were his own children. So the boys also wanted the client to adopt them. At the same time, the boys had a biological father who didn’t even speak to them.

What we do:

  • A petition was filed to terminate the parental rights of the biological father of the client’s wife’s two children, and a few months later the case was concluded with the termination of his parental rights.
  • An application has been submitted by the client for the adoption of two children, including a change to the children’s surnames and patronymics.

Result:

The case has been won. The children now bear the client’s surname and patronymic and are legally his children; furthermore, the client and his wife have had a baby girl, so there are now three children in the family.

Case concerning the determination of the fact of death

Enquiry:

The client’s mother died in the occupied territory of Ukraine. The aggressor state issued documents certifying her death, which are not recognised as legally valid in Ukraine. Consequently, the client was unable to use these invalid documents for any legally significant purposes, including inheriting the property left by his mother.

What we do:

  • An application has been filed to establish the fact of death in the occupied territory of Ukraine. A court ruling established the fact of the client’s mother’s death in the occupied territory of Ukraine.

Result:

The inheritance documents were submitted, and the flat and house were inherited.

Case concerning the granting of the right to marry

Enquiry:

The client had turned 16, but was unable to register her marriage to the young man she was dating and loved deeply, as she had to be 18 years old and have full legal capacity at the time of registration. In such cases, marriage is only possible by court order.

What we do:

  • An application was submitted to grant the girl the right to marry, as she had been in a relationship with her boyfriend for several years, they were in love, and, moreover, she was pregnant by him.
  • The girl’s parents, whose consent is required by law in such cases, were also in favour of their daughter getting married.

Result:

The court granted the client permission to marry at the age of 16, and she registered her marriage just one month later.

Case concerning the establishment of paternity

Enquiry:

The client had long since separated from her daughter’s father, with whom she had been in a de facto relationship and who was not listed as the father on her daughter’s birth certificate. A few years later, the girl’s father died whilst on a combat mission against the aggressor country. The child’s paternal grandmother (the girl’s grandmother) and the girl were eligible to claim substantial posthumous social benefits from the state. However, to do so, paternity had to be established.

What we do:

  • An application was filed to establish paternity; a DNA test was carried out using samples taken from the girl and her grandmother, given that her father had died and it was not possible to obtain a sample from him; and other documentary evidence and witness statements were gathered.

Result:

The court ruling established paternity, and the girl received state social assistance following the death of her father, who died defending his country.